Advertisement

In-house three-dimensional printing within the digital orthodontic workflow

Published:November 05, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.10.001

      Highlights

      • The orthodontic digital workflow involves intraoral scanning through to three-dimensional (3D) printing.
      • It only takes several hours from scan to retainer (and even aligner) fit with in-house 3D printing.
      • In-house 3D printing empowers orthodontists to take full control of aligner treatments.
      • Fusion (hybrid) orthodontics, enabled by in-house appliance provision, offers versatile and fully patient-centric treatment.

      ABSTRACT

      Intraoral scanning techniques, and the associated software, have revolutionized model acquisition, analysis, and virtual planning in orthodontics. Three-dimensional printing is the final aspect of this digital workflow, converting these virtual models and simulations of the tooth and occlusal movements into physical reality. This article provides an insight into how in-house three-dimensional printing is now a feasible and transformative reality for many orthodontic settings and how this empowers orthodontists to optimize their patient care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sachdev S
        • Tantidhnazet S
        • Saengfai NN.
        Accuracy of tooth movement with in-house clear aligners.
        J World Fed Orthod. 2021; 10: 177-182
      1. Cousley RRJ. The digital twin block appliance: concept, design, and fabrication. J Orthod in press.

        • Christensen LR.
        Digital workflows in orthodontics.
        J Clin Orthod. 2018; 52: 34-44
        • Graf S
        • Tarraf NE
        • Vasudavan S.
        Direct printed removable appliances: a new approach for the Twin-block appliance.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022; 162: 103-107
        • Cousley RR
        • Turner MJ.
        Digital model planning and computerised fabrication of orthognathic surgery wafers.
        J Orthod. 2014; 41: 38-45
        • Cousley RRJ
        • Bainbridge M
        • Rossouw PE.
        The accuracy of maxillary positioning using digital model planning and 3D printed wafers in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
        J Orthod. 2017; 44: 256-267
      2. Cousley RRJ. The use of orthodontic aligner software to design mini-implant guidance stents. J Clin Orthod In press.

        • Panayi C, Nearchos
        In-house three-dimensional designing and printing customized brackets.
        J World Fed Orthod. 2022; 11 (In this issue)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.10.004
      3. Hull CW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. Google Patents. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4575330A/en [Accessed 20th June 2022].

        • Pereira ABN
        • Almeida RC
        • Marassi C
        • Abdo Quintão CC
        • Carvalho FAR
        Do low-cost 3-dimensional printers produce suitable dental models?.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022; 161: 858-865
        • Brown GB
        • Currier GF
        • Kadioglu O
        • Kierl JP.
        Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 154: 733-739
        • Camardella LT
        • de Vasconcellos Vilella O
        • Breuning H.
        Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151: 1178-1187
        • Kim SY
        • Shin YS
        • Jung HD
        • Hwang CJ
        • Baik HS
        • Cha JY.
        Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153: 144-153
        • Sherman SL
        • Kadioglu O
        • Currier GF
        • Kierl JP
        • Li J.
        Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 157: 422-428
        • Cole D
        • Bencharit S
        • Carrico CK
        • Arias A
        • Tüfekçi E.
        Evaluation of fit for 3D-printed retainers compared with thermoform retainers.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155: 592-599
        • Jindal P
        • Juneja M
        • Siena FL
        • Bajaj D
        • Breedon P.
        Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156: 694-701
        • Hazeveld A
        • Huddleston Slater JJ
        • Ren Y
        Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145: 108-115
        • Cousley RRJ.
        Introducing 3D printing in your orthodontic practice.
        J Orthod. 2020; 47: 265-272
        • Kravitz ND
        • Groth C
        • Shannon T.
        CAD/CAM software for three-dimensional printing.
        J Clin Orthod. 2018; 52: 22-27
        • Favero CS
        • English JD
        • Cozad BE
        • Wirthlin JO
        • Short MM
        • Kasper FK.
        Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 152: 557-565