Advertisement

Effect of positional errors on the accuracy of cervical vertebrae maturation assessment using CBCT and lateral cephalograms

Published:November 05, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.09.006

      Abstract

      Background

      The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of single plane and multiplane rotational errors in yaw, pitch, and roll of the head while recording the lateral cephalogram on CVM (cervical vertebrae maturity) assessment.

      Methods

      A total of 40 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and 360 lateral cephalograms were analyzed for patients with different rotations: Controls (no rotation), Y5 (yaw 5° rotation), Y10 (yaw 10° rotation), R5 (roll 5° rotation), R10 (Roll 10° rotation), P5 (pitch 5° rotation), P10 (pitch 10° rotation), YRP5 (yaw, roll, and pitch 5° rotation), and YRP10 (yaw, roll, and pitch 10° rotation). The C2, C3, and C4 concavity and their base-anterior ratio and posterior-anterior ratio were measured. In addition, maxillomandibular linear parameters, such as effective mandibular length and height, mandibular body length, effective midface length, and maxillomandibular differential, were also evaluated.

      Results

      Y5, Y10, R5, and R10 led to overestimation of CVM in comparison with controls. Multiplane rotations (YRP5 and YRP10) led to more inaccuracies in CVM measurements than single plane rotations; 10° of rotation led to more inaccuracies than 5° of rotation while recording the lateral cephalogram, irrespective of the plane. Yaw rotational errors led to an underestimation of maxillomandibular linear measurements, whereas roll rotational errors led to an overestimation of the measurements; however, there were wide individual variations in the measurements between the different rotations and controls.

      Conclusions

      Rotational errors lead to overestimation of CVM assessment. Multiplane rotations cause higher inaccuracies than single plane rotations. Increased degree of rotations while capturing the lateral cephalograms lead to more inaccuracies in CVM assessment.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lewis A.B.
        • Garn S.M.
        The relationship between tooth formation and other maturation factors.
        Angle Orthod. 1960; 30: 70-77
        • Hunter C.J.
        The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence.
        Angle Orthod. 1966; 36: 44-54
        • Fishman L.S.
        Maturational patterns and prediction during adolescence.
        Angle Orthod. 1987; 57: 178-193
        • Franchi L.
        • Baccetti T.
        New emphasis on the role of mandibular skeletal maturity in dentofacial orthopedics.
        in: McNamara J.A. The Enigma of the Vertical Dimension. Craniofacial Growth Series. 36. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI2000: 253-275
        • Baccetti T.
        • Franchi L.
        • Toth L.R.
        • McNamara Jr., J.A.
        Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118: 159-170
        • O'Reilly M.T.
        • Yanniello G.J.
        Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae--a longitudinal cephalometric study.
        Angle Orthod. 1988; 58: 179-184
        • Franchi L.
        • Baccetti T.
        • McNamara Jr., J.A.
        Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118: 335-340
        • Beit P.
        • Peltomäki T.
        • Schätzle M.
        • Signorelli L.
        • Patcas R.
        Evaluating the agreement of skeletal age assessment based on hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae radiography.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144: 838-847
        • Ball G.
        • Woodside D.
        • Tompson B.
        • Hunter W.S.
        • Posluns J.
        Relationship between cervical vertebral maturation and mandibular growth.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139: e455-e461
        • Major P.W.
        • Johnson D.E.
        • Hesse K.L.
        • Glover K.E.
        Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification.
        Angle Orthod. 1996; 66: 51-60
        • Shim J.J.
        • Heo G.
        • Lagravère M.O.
        Assessment of skeletal maturation based on cervical vertebrae in CBCT.
        Int Orthod. 2012; 10: 351-362
        • Joshi V.
        • Yamaguchi T.
        • Matsuda Y.
        • Kaneko N.
        • Maki K.
        • Okano T.
        Skeletal maturity assessment with the use of cone-beam computerized tomography.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 113: 841-849
        • Kim H.J.
        • Hong M.
        • Park H.S.
        Analysis of dental compensation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156: 493-501
        • Ackerman J.L.
        • Proffit W.R.
        • Sarver D.M.
        • Ackerman M.B.
        • Kean M.R.
        Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131: 305-310
        • Baccetti T.
        • Franchi L.
        • McNamara Jr., J.A.
        An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth.
        Angle Orthod. 2002; 72: 316-323
        • Green P.
        • Macleod C.J.
        SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation.
        Methods Ecol Evol. 2016; 7: 493-498
        • Cooke M.S.
        • Wei S.H.
        The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93: 280-288
        • Leitão P.
        • Nanda R.S.
        Relationship of natural head position to craniofacial morphology.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117: 406-417
        • Marmulla R.
        • Wörtche R.
        • Mühling J.
        • Hassfeld S.
        Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; 34: 28-31
        • Chen Y.J.
        • Chen S.K.
        • Yao J.C.
        • Chang H.F.
        The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
        Angle Orthod. 2004; 74: 155-161
        • Nikneshan S.
        • Mohseni S.
        • Nouri M.
        • Hadian H.
        • Kharazifard M.J.
        The effect of emboss enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital lateral cephalometric images.
        Iran J Radiol. 2015; 12: e19302